Uber simply announced its self-driving autoes are available on San Francisco streets , but they're already caught up in polemic. That's because California regulators hold it needs a permit for experimenting, while Uber- true-blue to its extralegal biography- insists it doesn't. Autonomous lead Anthony Levandowski said on a call that" we respectfully disagree with the California Department of Motor Vehicles legal rendering of today's autonomous regulations, in particular that Uber needs a testing permit to operate its self-driving autoes in San Francisco ."
In Uber's view, because its autoes won't function without a human operator accommodated at the rotate, it's no different than other widely-implemented operator aide engineering. On the state's area, Wired reports the question was forwarded to the attorney general, but it's unclear what the next step will be. A announcement from the mayor's office articulated " The Mayor is working with the DMV, state officials and the city attorney's office to explore every possible avenues available to us to enforce state constitution ." The state could solicit an order, or rescinded the car's enrollments- bide tuned.
Such articles by Richard Lawler originally ran on Engadget, the definitive template to this connected life
Read Also : Uber's business models canvas - Strategy target market San Francisco tests violate California laws?
Source : Autoblog.com
Post a Comment
Post a Comment